Saturday, June 29, 2013

Supreme Court Rules 5-4 That Defense of Marriage Act is Unconstitutional

Supreme Court Rules 5-4 That Defense of Marriage Act is Unconstitutional | CNS News

gay marriage, doma

The Supreme Court ruled this past Wednesday that legally-married same-sex couples should receive the same benefits as heterosexual couples.  The court invalidated a provision of the federal Defense of Marriage Act which has prevented "married" gay couples from receiving the same range of tax, retirement, and health benefits that are generally available.  The vote was 5-4 and Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion. 

I knew this was eventually going to happen.   It doesn't make any difference what the Constitution says or what 200+ years of law says, our Supreme Court justices are going to discard all of that and rule in favor of an abomination.  Gay marriage is not of God.  God spelled it out specificaly in His word that marriage is between a man and a woman ONLY!!  You couldn't be much plainer than that.  This is nothing but a work of Satan.  Gay marriage is very perverted and twisted.  It's part of the globalist agenda to destroy the social foundation of America.  It's happening! 

To read the full story, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Friday, June 21, 2013

Obama Wants to Cut Nuclear Arms, Seeks Talks With Russia

Obama wants to cut nuclear arms, seeks talks with Russia | Reuters

U.S. President Barack Obama embraces German Chancellor Angela Merkel outside the Chancellery in Berlin, June 19, 2013. REUTERS-Thomas PeterPresident Barack Obama with German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

President Obama wants to reduce deployed nuclear weapons up to a third and revive negotiations with Russia to "move beyond Cold War nuclear postures", according to a speech he gave Wednesday in Berlin. 

Reducing the U.S.'s nuclear weapon arsenal isn't a wise choice considering the problems we have with threats from Iran and North Korea.  This false notion that if the U.S. reduces its nuclear stockpile is going to convince the world to follow suit and reduce their nuclear stockpile is foolish thinking.  America cannot be strong by reducing the amount of weapons we have on hand.  We need to maintain a first class defense system in this world.  If one thinks Russia and North Korea, for example, are going to reduce their nuclear stockpile because the U.S. does, is in denial.  They will keep on building their nuclear arsenal and outsmart the U.S. 

In the statements I just made, I'm in no way gung-ho in America being the world's policeman and trying to bring democracy throughout the world.  We shouldn't intervene in other nation's affairs unless it threatens America's or the Western Hemisphere's security interests.  But we do need to be the world's best when it comes to our nation's defense system.  We don't want be helpless in case we're attacked by a foreign enemy.

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Happy Father's Day!

Sunday is Father's Day



WHAT MAKES A DAD

God took the strength of a mountain,
The majesty of a tree,
The warmth of a summer sun,
The calm of a quiet sea,
The generous soul of nature,
The comforting arm of night,
The wisdom of the ages,
The power of the eagle's flight,
The joy of a morning in spring,
The faith of a mustard seed,
The patience of eternity,
The depth of a family need,
Then God combined these qualities,
When there was nothing more to add,
He knew his masterpiece was complete,
And so, He called it...Dad

Saturday, June 15, 2013

Rand Paul to Illegals: ‘We Will Find a Place for You;' Envisions 12 Million ‘New Taxpayers’

Rand Paul to Illegals: ‘We Will Find a Place for You;' Envisions 12 Million ‘New Taxpayers’ | CNS News

Rand PaulSenator Rand Paul (R-KY) speaking at CPAC on March 14, 2013.

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul in a prepared text for a speech he delivered Wednesday at the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference said to illegal aliens who desire to live and work in the United States, "We will find a place for you."  Paul also envisioned today's illegal aliens becoming additional "taxpayers."  I have a question for Senator Paul?  Why do you waste your time trying to cater to those who are here in the United States illegally?  I understand there are those here who come to work.  However, there's a proper way to handle those who are here illegally.  That's not to grant amnesty to them or make special provisions for them to be in the United States.  I have no issue with citizens from other countries who desire to immigrate to the United States as long as they go through the proper channel to either become U.S. citizens or legal residents, whichever the case may be.  What Senator Paul needs to be doing is to be pushing for a border fence to be build in the Southwestern part of the U.S. from Texas to California.  After that those that are here illegally needed to be tracked down and documented.  They need to be told if they want to work here, then they need work permits.  If they desire to eventually become U.S. citizens, then they need to go through the same procedure as those who do come into the U.S. legally.  It's not right to grant special privileges to those who are here illegally.  They should get in line to apply for U.S. citizenship and go through the proper procedures in obtaining U.S. citizenship.  Our elected elite don't want to do it that way.  Our elected elite are trying to flood this country with illegals and totally transform America into a Third World country. 

I have never suggested that the solution to the illegal immigration was to automatically deport all those who are here illegally back to their country of origin, unless they have a criminal or homicide record.  However, we don't need to overlook those who are here in our country who haven't been properly documented.  If they're here, they need to be asked what their intentions are for being in the U.S.  If they are here to work, then give them work permits and have a file on them.  If there are illegals here who would like to become U.S. citizens, then make them get in line and fill out the proper paperwork in obtaining citizenship.  However, giving free medical care, free education, and drivers' licenses to those who are here illegally must stop.  Illegals shouldn't be entitled to free handouts.  They shouldn't be given free benefits on the backs of hardworking citizens whose tax dollars support this kind of nonsense. 

Senator Paul is just another politician who is purchasing air time to raise his profile so he can seek higher office someday, such as the presidency in 2016.  To read the full  story, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Friday, June 14, 2013

Rep. Slaughter Invokes Name of Two Pro-Lifers to Support New York Pro-Abortion Bill

Rep. Slaughter Invokes Name of Two Pro-Lifers to Support New York Pro-Abortion Bill | CNS News

louise slaughterRep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY)

Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) has invoked the name of two pro-lifers to support a sweeping pro-abortion in the New York state legislature.  Slaughter invoked the name of suffragist Susan B. Anthony, an ardent pro-lifer to support this monstrous bill in the New York state legislature.  New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is looking to codify the Roe vs. Wade case into state law, which would guarantee that abortion is legal in New York if something were to happen that the 1973 Supreme Court case Roe vs. Wade were to be overturned.  The 10-point bill named the "Women's Equality Act" will tackle other issues as equal pay and anti-discrimination measures.  "Since the time of Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, New York has been a national leader for women's equality and fairness," Slaughter stated in a statement last week.  "Leaders on women's rights at the federal level need good partners at the state level, and I'm proud of the package Governor Cuomo has outlined to improve women's rights throughout our great state." 

How abominable to invoke early suffragists Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton on a pro-abortion bill in New York.  Both early suffragists were pro-life.  I know they both were the leaders of the early feminist movement, but the early feminist movement wasn't about abortion.  The early feminist leaders were concerned about the plight of children.  They even supported the temperance movement, which was opposed to the use of alcohol.  Tell me of a modern-day feminist that's opposed to the sale and consumption of alcohol in today's society.  I wouldn't even call today's modern feminist movement the "feminist movement".  I call them the unisex movement.  They've tried to remove distinctions between men and women for the last few decades.  The truth is there are God-given difference amongst the sexes and you can't deny it, no matter how much you try to.  The Susan B. Anthony List is an organization that supports pro-life candidates.  To use their names on a pro-abortion bill in New York is very disgusting.  Abortion is murder and it's inhumane.  To sanction such a measure just shows how evil and corrupt the New York politicians are.  God help us.  To read the article, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Senate Immigration Bill Clears First Hurdles, Still Faces Tough Republican Opposition

Senate immigration bill clears first hurdles, still faces tough Republican opposition | Fox News


Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Senate Minority Whip Jon Cornyn (R-TX) speak with reporters on Capitol Hill.

The Senate passed preliminary, along with key votes Tuesday in its march to the approval of allowing amnesty for illegals into the United States.  Fox News said it was sweeping, bipartisan immigration reform.  I don't deny that it's bipartisan since both politicial parties are in support of this bill.  I believe it will be a matter of time before the full Senate votes for this bill.  Since the first step has been taken for the two procedural votes to place this bill formally before the Senate and open for amendments, then it will be a matter of time before the Senate approves this immigration bill.  Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), said that the 60-vote majority He said the bill has serious flaws.

As far as I'm concerned, the whole bill is flawed.  However, it doesn't make any difference whether it's flawed or not when it comes to passing Congress.  The Affordable Care Act of 2010 is flawed, but it still passed Congress.  They don't care.  As long as the socialist agenda to radically transform America is passed, that's all that matter.  I guarantee you if this is the bill that Obama wants passed, it will passed, regardless how many Senators he has to bribe to make it happen.  I'll assure you that.  To read the full story, click on the above link from FoxNews.com.

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Southern Baptists Consider Resolution on Scouting

Southern Baptists consider resolution on scouting | CNS News

Southern Baptists
Fred Luter Jr. pointing upward after being re-elected as the Southern Baptist Convention's president for a second time. 

Southern Baptist convention leaders have proposed a resolution expressing their opposition to the Boy Scouts of America's new policy allowing gay scouts.  The resolution also calls on for the Boy Scouts to remove from executive and board leadership the individuals who earlier sought to allow gays as both members and leaders without consulting the many religious groups that sponsor Scout troops.  While the resolution doesn't recommend that Southern Baptists drop ties with the Scouts, it expresses support for those churches and families that decide to do so. 

I have a perfect resolution for the Southern Baptist Convention.  The convention should have no ties with the Boy Scouts.  Any previous ties that the convention has held with the Boy Scouts should be immediately dropped.  NO qualms about it.  They shouldn't sponsor them nor be a part of their organization given the fact the current leadership of the Boy Scouts of America wants to welcome homosexual Scouts as leaders.  Not only that but any of the leadership of the Southern Baptist Convention that still supports the Scouts or is sympathetic to the Scouts (since they're welcoming homosexual Scouts into the organization), then they shouldn't be serving in any capacity in the Southern Baptist Convention.  Sodomy is an abomination in God's eyes and Romans 1 makes that abundantly clear.  The church has no business in yoking up with any organization that sanctions anything that's a direct violation to God's word.  Sodomy is a direct violation of God's word.  The Southern Baptist Convention needs to drop all support from the Boy Scouts of America.  I know that sounds bold but that's the truth.  God says the church isn't to mix with the world.  You can't support an organization that sanctions something as abominable as sodomy.

To read the full story, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Is Our Guardian Angel Big Brother?--Pat Buchanan

Is Our Guardian Angel Big Brother? | CNS News



Pat Buchanan wrote another interesting articles for CNS News concerning the issue of Big Brother.  Over the past weekend, the news has revolved around the U.S. government surveillance program and Big Brother spying on us.  Anybody that's paid attention to the news since 9/11 shouldn't be surprised the government to hear about the government spying on us.  The person who set this surveillance program into motion was George W. Bush in 2001 when he signed the Patriot Act a month following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.  The Patriot Act has enabled the government to further encroach upon our freedoms.  Of course, President Obama will take things further than what his predecessor did.  I can recall either in 2006 or 2007 when they're were speaking of illegal wiretapping in the news during the Bush administration as a mean to track down terrorists.  I can remember how members of the media were seemingly disturbed over that.  This is nothing to be surprised at. 

To read Pat Buchanan's article, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Obama: 'We Don't Want to Tax All Businesses Out of Business'

Obama: 'We Don't Want to Tax All Businesses Out of Business' | CNS News

obama

So, in other words, there are some businesses that you do desire to tax out of business.  Is that correct Mr. President?  President Obama wouldn't agree to what I just said it but the way he worded it he was in essence saying there are some businesses that he wants to tax out of business.  Some corporations such as General Electric or Berkshire Hathaway, for example, he doesn't want to tax out of business.  I'm certain he makes certain that those corporations hardly pay anything in the way of taxes.  Why do I say that?  Because the heads of those corporations such as Jeffrey Immelt and Warren Buffett, supported Obama in his re-election campaign.  Obama will take care of his cronies in the business world.  I've made the statement that President is destroying capitalism with his taxation and regulation policies.  That is true.  But those businesses he's not interested in them succeeding.  There are some huge corporations that play a role in Obama's agenda to create a one-world government and destroy America as we know it.  Those businesses will be okay.  He will reward them for supporting his administration and advancing his socialist agenda.  But any business that plays no role in the administration's socialist agenda, he's going to make it difficult for them to succeed.  They will have to abide by the regulations set forth by the Affordable Care Act, for example.  I guarantee you G.E. probably won't have to.  That's the way it works in Obama's universe.

To read the full story, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Sunday, June 9, 2013

Beck: Not a Jew Alive if Hitler Had Obama's Tech

Beck: Not a Jew alive if Hitler had Obama’s tech


Glenn Beck

I guarantee you that every Jew that's alive today is very glad that Adolf Hitler didn't have the surveillance technology that America possesses today.  If Hitler had the video cameras and spy technology that 21st century America possesses today, then the number of Jews murdered during the Holocaust would have far surpassed the six million Jews that were gassed in the late 30's and 40's.  The number would have been in the millions.  It would pale in comparison to the six million several decades ago.  It's very scary when you consider how vast our technology is today.  With the internet, social networking, surveillance cameras, and the list continues, the Jews wouldn't have a chance at hiding back in the 1940's.  Video cameras would've caught them everywhere.  It would've been tragic.  If another "Hitler" arises and becomes president of the United States, then Jews, Christians, and those that oppose the U.S. government's regime would be slaughtered.  It would be a bloodbath in the United States.

To read the full story and watch the video of Glenn Beck, click on the above link from WND.

Saturday, June 8, 2013

Pelosi on Affordable Care Act: 'Be Optimistic About it, it is a Very, Very Exciting Enterprise'

Pelosi on Affordable Care Act: 'Be Optimistic About it, it is a Very, Very Exciting Enterprise' | CNS News



Nancy Pelosi is definitely going to be optimistic about the Affordable Care Act when you consider the fact that neither she, nor the president, nor any of the members of the House or Senate will be participating in the Affordable Care Act.  This is being thrust upon the American people.  It's all about taking control of the nation's healthcare industry, and thus it gives the government the power to furthern encroach upon the American peoples' rights in this nation.  It's all about control and socialized medicine.  It has nothing to do with making health care more affordable.  The American people are in for a rude awakening once the key provisions of Obamacare take effect next year.

Friday, June 7, 2013

Obama's UN Ambassador Pick has History of Controversial Comments

Obama's UN ambassador pick has history of controversial comments | Fox News

PrePresident Obama with the U.N. Ambassador nominee Samantha Power

The former White House Adviser and longtime Obama friend nominated Wednesday as the next U.N. ambassador to the United Nations has a history of controversial comments that could haunt her in the confirmation process--including likening U.S. foreign policies to those of Nazis.  To give you an idea of what type of woman she is, she is married to former regulatory czar Cass Sunstein.  I wrote a post about Cass Sunstein in 2009 giving you his vision of America.  She's very liberal in her views of America.  Even though her views are scary, she will be confirmed as the U.N. ambassador.  No Republicans in the Senate are going to filibuster her nomination or make any serious effort to prevent her nomination.  They all go along with Obama's appointments regardless how new age or communist their viewpoints are.  They don't care.  The Republicans have done nothing but help facilitate President Obama in fulfilling his agenda upon America.  I'm not going to take the time to list her controversial comments.  I'll allow you to read them when you click on the link above from FoxNews.com.

Florida Gov. Vetoes Driver’s License Bill for Illegals

Florida Gov. Vetoes Driver’s License Bill for Illegals | CNS News

rick scottFlorida Republican Governor Rick Scott

Florida Governor Rick Scott vetoed a bill that would have allowed illegal aliens who received "deferred action" by the U.S. Homeland Security Department in 2012 to obtain state driver's licenses going forward because he said the federal policy was "adopted without legal basis.  He's exactly right.  It's against the federal immigration laws to allow illegals to possess certain privileges such as driver's licenses, for example.  The last several presidential administrations have ignored the laws on the books and allowed illegals to flood our country.  Former president Ronald Reagan signed an amnesty bill in November 1986 to grant amnesty to those who were here illegally years ago.  Now the President wants to grant amnesty to those illegals who are already here in the United States and give them free health care.  It's ridiculous.  I applaud Governor Scott for vetoeing that bill.  To read the full story, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Sebelius Won’t Intervene in 10-Year-Old’s Fight for Lung Transplant

Sebelius Won’t Intervene in 10-Year-Old’s Fight for Lung Transplant | CNS News

sebeliusHealth & Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius

You know how many liberals criticized conservatives for saying that Obamacare wouldn't deny coverage to those that need it.  Here's a situation where a 10-year old girl has cystic fibrosis and she could die within weeks without a lung transplant.  The reasoning for Sebeliu's decision is that the girl is too young for a lung transplant according to rules adopted in 2005 by transplant doctors.  She supposedly has to be 12 to be eligible to receive a lung transplant instead of 10.  To read the full story, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

New Jersey Sen. Lautenberg dead at 89

New Jersey Sen. Lautenberg dead at 89 | CNS News

Obit LautenbergNew Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg dead at 89

Frank Lautenberg, the liberal Democratic Senator from New Jersey, died Monday June 3, 2013 at age 89.  He was in poor health for some time.  He died at a New York hospital suffering from complications of viral pneumonia.  In April 2013 he returned to the Senate to vote on several gun control votes favored by President Obama.  He was a multimillionaire businessman who was an accomplished politician.  He was a strong advocate of gun control.  He was the driving force behind the laws that banned smoking on most U.S. flights and made 21 the drinking age in all 50 states.  At age 89 he was the oldest person in the Senate and the last World War II veteran serving in the Senate.  He served in the Senate for nearly three decades in two stints.  He won the first time in 1982 in an upset victory over Republican Rep. Millicent Fenwick.  He won his last race in 2008. 

To read the full story, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Abolish the Corporate Income Tax!

Abolish the Corporate Income Tax! | CNS News


Columnist Pat Buchanan.

Syndicated columnist Pat Buchanan wrote a good article making the case to abolish the corporate income tax rate.  I agree with him there.  I would go a step further and suggest we abolish the present U.S. tax code altogether and establish a flat tax rate or a national sales tax.  The tax code is very burdensome and ridiculous.  The government likes to impose tax rates on business because it places the government in the position where they can control business' behavior.  The federal government knows the reason why federal corporations move much of their business overseas--it's to avoid having to pay the 35% corporate tax along with the mundane regulations imposed upon them.  The government likes it that way because they play a role how the market will operate in the United States.  If the government places stipulations upon corporations which make it more difficult to conduct business in the U.S., then they'll move many of their plants overseas to avoid unnecesary costs. 

The problem is we have Marxists who control over government. They want America to be a communist nation.  As long as the taxation policies continue, more businesses will be relocating where they don't have to pay those taxes.  To read the full story, click on the above link from CNSNews.com.

Monday, June 3, 2013

GAO: HHS Already Rationing Enrollment in Obamacare’s Pre-Existing Condition Plan | CNS News

GAO: HHS Already Rationing Enrollment in Obamacare’s Pre-Existing Condition Plan | CNS News

obamaPresident Obama signing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law on March 23, 2010.

A pre-existing health insurance program established by Obamacare is already straining its own budget, and to control costs, the admiistrations Health & Human Services (HHS) has stopped enrolling any new people into the program, according to an audit by the General Accountability Office (GAO).  In addition to that, HHS has directed the program to shift more of the costs onto the current enrollees, thus raising the out-of-pocket health care expenses for the people with pre-existing conditions.  That's in order to control spending.  It's very ironic.  The rationing or the denial of health care coverage in the marketplace for people with pre-existing conditions, or insurers charging higher premiums to people with pre-existing conditions were reasons cited by President Obama and most Congressional Democrats for implementing Obamacare.  You can't trust the president on anything. 

When President Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law on March 23, 2010, he stated that tens of thousands of uninsured Americans with a pre-existing conditions, or parents of children with a pre-existing condition, will no longer be denied the coverage they need.  He said the insurance companies will no longer be able to drop people's coverage when they get sick.  After Obamacare was signed, two temporary programs were established in March 2010, the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program and the Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plan (CHIP).  Each program was allotted $5 billion. 

I guarantee you the cost of Obamacare is going to be so sky high that it won't be funny.  If Obamacare is having trouble keeping these two programs funded, I can't imagine when the key provisions take place next year.  Also, I project there will be much rationing taking place.  What the government will do when faced with that decision is to decided who does and doesn't deserve medical coverage.  That's coming.  I guarantee you terminally ill patients and elderly people aren't going to make the list to receive coverage. 

To read the full story, click on the above link from CNS News.com.

Sunday, June 2, 2013

Sebelius to Class of '13: Good News, Obamacare Gives You Free Birth Control

Sebelius to Class of '13: Good News, Obamacare Gives You Free Birth Control | CNS News

Sebelius to Class of 2013: Good News, Obamacare Offers You Free Birth Control and SterilizationPresident Obama with Health & Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius

In an effort to tout Obamacare to the graduating classes of 2013, Health & Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius wrote in a HealthCare blog post to the class of 2013, "Thanks to Obamacare, high school and college graduates can look forward to "protections and benefits" that give you "greater control" including birth control."  In the May 22 posting "Class of 2013: Graduate with peace of mind."  Sebelius congratulated the new graduates and assured them that because of the Affordable Care Act they will have less to worry about in terms of health insurance.

Of all the things to say to graduating classes online, this one is pathetic.  First of all, peace of mind doesn't come through taking birth control.  Peace of mind comes through the Lord.  Talking about peace of mind, a woman's not going to find it through taking birth control and hoping she doesn't become accidentally pregnant.  The way for an unmarried man or woman to have peace of mind is abstinence.  Don't place yourself in a situation where you fool around with fornication.  The time for sex is after you walk down the wedding aisle--not before.  If unmarried people will flee from fornication and abstain from sex until marriage, then there would be no need whatsoever in taking birth control.  Birth control should be used only by married couples.  Life isn't found in have sex outside of wedlock.  I will say to those who have just graduated from high school or college:  If you're not married, don't be thinking about having sex as an unmarried person.  You need to find a job to be financially secure.  Then later after you find the right person and you get married, then you can concern yourself with birth control.  Birth Control is not the answer for unmarried couples.  It's abstinence.  You won't regret it if you wait until marriage before you have a sexual relationship.  That's the way God designed it.

To read the full story, click on the above link from CNSNews.

Saturday, June 1, 2013

Ann Romney: Public Feels "Breach of Trust" Amid White House Controversies

Ann Romney: Public feels ‘breach of trust’ amid White House controversies - The Hill's Video



Ann Romney, wife of 2012 GOP candidate Mitt Romney, stated that there is a "breach of trust" between the American people and the government, citing the three controversies that have placed the White House on the offensive such as the Benghazi hearings, and the IRS targeting conservative groups such as the Tea Party, to name a couple.  This isn't any surprise to me.  There has been a "breach of trust" between the government and the American people for years, and our elected elite doesn't care.  Our elected elite think they are above the average American person and they can misspend taxpayers dollars and use them for their own pleasure, such as extravagant vacations, for example.  The agenda of the government isn't the agenda of the American people.  We are moving closer to a fascist government. Once the key provisions of Obamacare come in place in 2014, our government will be placing even tighter controls over the American people.  Obamacare will enable our politicians to take over 1/6th of the nations' economy and they will be able to dictate the kind of lifestyle we can live.  They don't care.  Our elected representatives aren't accountable to the American people.  They answer to the globalists who are out to create a one world government, which will happen eventually.

As far as disappointment is concerned, I thought it was disappointing the kind of campaign Ann's husband ran last year.  He didn't run much of a campaign.  He didn't want to call Obama a Socialist.  He wasn't aggressive in going after Obama concerning how he ran the country during his four years as president.  Romney also didn't very well articulate the kind of vision he supposedly had for America.  Romney didn't run to win, which I felt was disgraceful.  Politics has become very corrupt and wicked and it isn't about God, country, and the Constitution, which our nation was built upon.

To read the full story, click on the above link from The Hill.